Next flaw is provided they lead to the new breadwinner’s occupation far if and this refers to as especially true as increasing numbers of wives get to be the highest earner into the a relationship

There are a few noticeable analytical problems regarding the “equal contribution” dispute anywhere between a breadwinner and a-stay at your home parent (“SAHP”) that exist, I think, exclusively given that courts you should never reasonably make an evaluation of your outline however, there are several reforms that i believe create result in fairer consequences. The obvious flaw is the assumption you to definitely good SAHP always produces the same share despite just what their mate acquired. For folks who pursue you to definitely argument so you can their logical achievement this may be means all the SAHP whoever spouse generated ?100k contributed doubly tough since the most of the SAHP whoever spouse earned ?50k! Clearly a junk, however, zero legal is about to look into the brand new detail and this was presumably as to why so it lazy expectation is created. I really don’t imagine it might harm towards the court to take on the positions of activities just before people. In my own case, I’d every official certification that have transmitted me personally within my industry and are setting up vast quantities out-of era. My partner as well was unqualified, in a minimal paid down inexperienced business and you can refused overtime whenever it had been offered. It is not for example I am able to take advantage of the equivalent amount of totally free time since the she does anyway making it nonetheless an unjust result, zero?